Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: adjust to reservation.h renaming

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:50:07AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:56:06AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 11:39 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 01:08:32PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > > Am 04.03.20 um 13:07 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn:
> > > > > Commit 52791eeec1d9 ("dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv")
> > > > > renamed include/linux/reservation.h to include/linux/dma-resv.h, but
> > > > > missed the reference in the MAINTAINERS entry.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Since then, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test complains:
> > > > > 
> > > > >    warning: no file matches F: include/linux/reservation.h
> > > > > 
> > > > > Adjust the DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK entry in MAINTAINERS.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Co-developed-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@xxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@xxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > You'll push this too?
> > > -Daniel
> > > 
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Christian, please pick this patch.
> > > > > applies cleanly on current master and next-20200303
> > > > > 
> > > > >   MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> > > > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > index 6158a143a13e..3d6cb2789c9e 100644
> > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > @@ -5022,7 +5022,7 @@ L:	dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >   L:	linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > > > >   F:	drivers/dma-buf/
> > > > >   F:	include/linux/dma-buf*
> > > > > -F:	include/linux/reservation.h
> > > > > +F:	include/linux/dma-resv.h
> > > > >   F:	include/linux/*fence.h
> > > > >   F:	Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> > > > >   K:	dma_(buf|fence|resv)
> > 
> > Slightly unrelated:
> > 
> > The K: entry matches a lot of other things
> > and may have a lot of false positive matches
> > like any variable named dma_buffer
> > 
> > This should also use (?:...) to avoid a perl
> > capture group.
> > 
> > Perhaps:
> > 
> > K:	'\bdma_(?:buf|fence|resv)\b'
> 
> Hm either people aren't using get_maintainers.pl consistently, or it
> doesn't seem to be a real world problem. I'm not seeing any unrelated
> patches on dri-devel at least.
> 
> But happy to merge such a patch if it shows up ofc, it's definitely the
> more correct thing :-)

Ofc as usual if you lean out the window you immediately get to eat your
hat, right after sending this I got a mail from syzbot about some random
stuff because of this :-)

I'm gonna do the patch now ...
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch