Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/7] security: Refactor declaration of LSM hooks

[KP Singh]

On 23-Mär 12:56, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:45 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The information about the different types of LSM hooks is scattered
> > in two locations i.e. union security_list_options and
> > struct security_hook_heads. Rather than duplicating this information
> > even further for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM, define all the hooks with the
> > LSM_HOOK macro in lsm_hook_names.h which is then used to generate all
> > the data structures required by the LSM framework.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/lsm_hook_names.h | 354 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h      | 622 +--------------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 360 insertions(+), 616 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/lsm_hook_names.h
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_names.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_names.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..412e4ca24c9b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_names.h
> 
> It's not really just hook names, it's full hook definitions, no? So
> lsm_hook_defs.h seems a bit more appropriate. Just for consideration,
> not that I care that strongly :)

I like lsm_hook_defs.h better too :) Updated.

- KP

> 
> 
> [...]