Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] x86/split_lock: Fix and virtualization of split lock detection

From: Sean Christopherson
Date: Tue Mar 24 2020 - 13:47:37 EST

Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/7] bpf: lsm: Implement attach, detach and execution"
Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: wan: wanxl: use $(CC68K) instead of $(AS68K) for rebuilding firmware"
In reply to: Xiaoyao Li: "[PATCH v6 1/8] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:18:51PM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> So sorry for the noise that I forgot to CC the maillist.

You also forgot to add RESEND :-) Tagging the patches like so

[PATCH RESEND v6 0/8] x86/split_lock: Fix and virtualization of split lock detection

lets folks that received the originals identify and respond to the "new"
thread.

Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/7] bpf: lsm: Implement attach, detach and execution"
Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: wan: wanxl: use $(CC68K) instead of $(AS68K) for rebuilding firmware"
In reply to: Xiaoyao Li: "[PATCH v6 1/8] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]