Re: [PATCH 1/4] ubifs: remove broken lazytime support

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello!

On 03/25/2020 03:28 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> When "ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs" introduces atime
> support to ubifs, it also lazytime support, but that support is
                           ^ includes?

> terminally broken, as it causes mark_inode_dirty_sync to be called from
> __writeback_single_inode, which will then trigger the locking assert
> in ubifs_dirty_inode.  Just remove this broken support for now, it can
> be readded later, especially as some infrastructure changes should
> make that easier soon.
> 
> Fixes: 8c1c5f263833 ("ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
[...]

MBR, Sergei