Re: [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: i2c: dw: Add Baikal-T1 SoC I2C controller

[Sergey Semin]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 04:43:40PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:19:52 +0300, <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Just add the "be,bt1-i2c" compatible string to the bindings. The rest of
> > the DW APB I2C properties can be freely used to describe the Baikal-T1
> > I2C controller dts-node.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Seeing you and us having doubts regarding our vendor prefix and the
corresponding patch still hasn't been accepted, in the next patchset release
perhaps I will have to change the compatible string of this driver. It depends
on a result of the discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/13/239

Rob, could you get back to it, so we could come up with a solution?

Currently most of our team members are leaning towards "baikal,t1" = "vendor,chip"
prefixes to all the SoC specific devices. So the Baikal-T1 I2C compatible string
would be renamed to "baikal,t1-i2c". What do you think?

Regards,
-Sergey