Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/vblank: Add vblank works

From: Lyude Paul
Date: Fri Mar 27 2020 - 16:38:55 EST

Next message: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [PATCH] watchdog: sp805: fix restart handler"
Previous message: Pandruvada, Srinivas: "Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] ACPI: fix: Update Tiger Lake ACPI device IDs"
In reply to: Lyude Paul: "Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/vblank: Add vblank works"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Oops, completely forgot to link to the work_struct version of this patch:

[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lyudess/linux/-/commit/f57886aebbd9631f1ee6e61b516bf73afbfe74f4

On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 16:29 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Adding Tejun to this thread per-Daniel's suggestion on IRC.
>
> Hi Tejun! So, I don't know what your experience with modesetting related
> stuff
> is so I'll quickly explain some important concepts here regarding scanlines,
> vblanks, etc. If you already understand this, feel free to skip this next
> paragraph.
>
> From the perspective of a computer, every time a computer monitor displays a
> new frame it's done by "scanning out" the display image from top to bottom,
> one row of pixels at a time. which row of pixels we're on is referred to as
> the scanline. Additionally, there's usually a couple of extra scanlines
> which
> we scan out, but aren't actually displayed on the screen (these sometimes
> get
> used by HDMI audio and friends, but that's another story). The period where
> we're on these scanlines is referred to as the vblank, this is important.
>
> On a lot of display hardware, programming needs to take effect during the
> vertical blanking period so that settings like gamma, what frame we're
> scanning out, etc. can be safely changed without showing visual tearing on
> the
> screen. In some unforgiving hardware, some of this programming has to both
> start and end in the same vblank. This is apparently the case on the
> majority
> of Intel GPUs in the wild right now, most notably with gamma updates which
> involve mashing over 2KiB of registers during the vblank. Other drivers have
> very similar needs to this (nouveau in particular is why I'm here, we need
> it
> for CRC related stuff) so we figured it'd be a good idea to add a set of
> helpers for performing realtime hardware programming that's synchronized to
> vblank intervals. In particular, this is aimed at hardware programming that
> would be a bit too awkward to try to pull off entirely in interrupt context.
> We call these vblank workers.
>
> We first tried doing this using plain old kthreads, as you can see in the
> patch below, since we could schedule them as realtime. Additionally, the
> plan
> was to use this in i915 combined with pm_qos to get rid of cstate latency
> when
> handling the original vblank interrupt. Note, our time constraints are a bit
> more forgiving in nouveau so you won't see any pm_qos mentions in this
> series.
>
> In an effort to try to avoid reinventing parts of the kernel's worker
> infrastructure though, we tried to see if we could implement these with
> simple
> work_structs and workqueues with HIGH_PRI | UNBOUNDED,[1]. But, it would
> seem
> that this work_struct approach is quite unreliable and we still usually fail
> to start the register programming in time for Intel's vblank worker usecase.
>
> So, so far using plain old RT kthreads seems to make things about as
> reliable
> as I think we're going to get. Note - even using kthreads we _still_
> sometimes
> miss the vblank period and end up tearing a bit on screen, but it happens
> significantly less often then with work_structs and is basically going to be
> as fast as we can get (in the future, Intel wants to try fixing this by
> doing
> this hardware programming outside of the CPU, but for now we're stuck with
> this).
>
> With all of this being said - we'd still like to avoid having to reinvent
> workers if possible, so we were wondering if there was any kind of realtime
> worker that could be used for this instead? I haven't been able to find any
> way of scheduling workers to be realtime, and I'm not sure if implementing
> this in Linux's workqueues would be realistic either. It'd be nice to avoid
> having to use plain old kthreads if possible :). What do you think Tejun?
>
> On Wed, 2020-03-18 at 14:46 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 08:40:58PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > From: Ville SyrjÃlÃ <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Add some kind of vblank workers. The interface is similar to regular
> > > delayed works, and also allows for re-scheduling.
> > >
> > > Whatever hardware programming we do in the work must be fast
> > > (must at least complete during the vblank, sometimes during
> > > the first few scanlines of vblank), so we'll fire up a per-crtc
> > > high priority thread for this.
> > >
> > > [based off patches from Ville SyrjÃlÃ <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > > change below to signoff later]
> > >
> > > Cc: Ville SyrjÃlÃ <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hm not really sold on the idea that we have should reinvent our own worker
> > infrastructure here. Imo a vblank_work should look like a delayed work,
> > i.e. using struct work_struct as the base class, and wrapping the vblank
> > thing around it (instead of the timer). That alos would allow drivers to
> > schedule works on their own work queues, allowing for easier flushing and
> > all that stuff.
> >
> > Also if we do this I think we should try to follow the delayed work abi as
> > closely as possible (e.g. INIT_VBLANK_WORK, queue_vblank_work,
> > mod_vblank_work, ...). Delayed workers (whether timer or vblank) have a
> > bunch of edges cases where consistently would be really great to avoid
> > surprises and bugs.
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 322 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/drm/drm_vblank.h | 34 ++++
> > > 2 files changed, 356 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> > > index da7b0b0c1090..06c796b6c381 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> > > @@ -25,7 +25,9 @@
> > > */
> > >
> > > #include <linux/export.h>
> > > +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> > > #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> > > +#include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h>
> > >
> > > #include <drm/drm_crtc.h>
> > > #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> > > @@ -91,6 +93,7 @@
> > > static bool
> > > drm_get_last_vbltimestamp(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
> > > ktime_t *tvblank, bool in_vblank_irq);
> > > +static int drm_vblank_get(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe);
> > >
> > > static unsigned int drm_timestamp_precision = 20; /* Default to 20
> > > usecs. */
> > >
> > > @@ -440,6 +443,9 @@ void drm_vblank_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET));
> > >
> > > del_timer_sync(&vblank->disable_timer);
> > > +
> > > + wake_up_all(&vblank->vblank_work.work_wait);
> > > + kthread_stop(vblank->vblank_work.thread);
> > > }
> > >
> > > kfree(dev->vblank);
> > > @@ -447,6 +453,108 @@ void drm_vblank_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > dev->num_crtcs = 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int vblank_work_thread(void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = data;
> > > +
> > > + while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> > > + struct drm_vblank_work *work, *next;
> > > + LIST_HEAD(list);
> > > + u64 count;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_irq(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + ret = wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq(vblank->queue,
> > > + kthread_should_stop()
> > > + !list_empty(&vblank-
> > > > vblank_work.work_list),
> > > + vblank->dev-
> > > > event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + WARN_ON(ret && !kthread_should_stop() &&
> > > + list_empty(&vblank->vblank_work.irq_list) &&
> > > + list_empty(&vblank->vblank_work.work_list));
> > > +
> > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(work, next,
> > > + &vblank->vblank_work.work_list,
> > > + list) {
> > > + list_move_tail(&work->list, &list);
> > > + work->state = DRM_VBL_WORK_RUNNING;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + spin_unlock_irq(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (list_empty(&list))
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + count = atomic64_read(&vblank->count);
> > > + list_for_each_entry(work, &list, list)
> > > + work->func(work, count);
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_irq(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(work, next, &list, list) {
> > > + if (work->reschedule) {
> > > + list_move_tail(&work->list,
> > > + &vblank->vblank_work.irq_list);
> > > + drm_vblank_get(vblank->dev, vblank->pipe);
> > > + work->reschedule = false;
> > > + work->state = DRM_VBL_WORK_WAITING;
> > > + } else {
> > > + list_del_init(&work->list);
> > > + work->cancel = false;
> > > + work->state = DRM_VBL_WORK_IDLE;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + spin_unlock_irq(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + wake_up_all(&vblank->vblank_work.work_wait);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void vblank_work_init(struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank)
> > > +{
> > > + struct sched_param param = {
> > > + .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO - 1,
> > > + };
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vblank->vblank_work.irq_list);
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vblank->vblank_work.work_list);
> > > + init_waitqueue_head(&vblank->vblank_work.work_wait);
> > > +
> > > + vblank->vblank_work.thread =
> > > + kthread_run(vblank_work_thread, vblank, "card %d crtc %d",
> > > + vblank->dev->primary->index, vblank->pipe);
> > > +
> > > + ret = sched_setscheduler(vblank->vblank_work.thread,
> > > + SCHED_FIFO, &param);
> > > + WARN_ON(ret);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * drm_vblank_work_init - initialize a vblank work item
> > > + * @work: vblank work item
> > > + * @crtc: CRTC whose vblank will trigger the work execution
> > > + * @func: work function to be executed
> > > + *
> > > + * Initialize a vblank work item for a specific crtc.
> > > + */
> > > +void drm_vblank_work_init(struct drm_vblank_work *work, struct drm_crtc
> > > *crtc,
> > > + void (*func)(struct drm_vblank_work *work, u64
> > > count))
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> > > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &dev->vblank[drm_crtc_index(crtc)];
> > > +
> > > + work->vblank = vblank;
> > > + work->state = DRM_VBL_WORK_IDLE;
> > > + work->func = func;
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&work->list);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vblank_work_init);
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * drm_vblank_init - initialize vblank support
> > > * @dev: DRM device
> > > @@ -481,6 +589,8 @@ int drm_vblank_init(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned
> > > int num_crtcs)
> > > init_waitqueue_head(&vblank->queue);
> > > timer_setup(&vblank->disable_timer, vblank_disable_fn, 0);
> > > seqlock_init(&vblank->seqlock);
> > > +
> > > + vblank_work_init(vblank);
> > > }
> > >
> > > DRM_INFO("Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013).\n");
> > > @@ -1825,6 +1935,22 @@ static void drm_handle_vblank_events(struct
> > > drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
> > > trace_drm_vblank_event(pipe, seq, now, high_prec);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void drm_handle_vblank_works(struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_vblank_work *work, *next;
> > > + u64 count = atomic64_read(&vblank->count);
> > > +
> > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(work, next, &vblank->vblank_work.irq_list,
> > > + list) {
> > > + if (!vblank_passed(count, work->count))
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + drm_vblank_put(vblank->dev, vblank->pipe);
> > > + list_move_tail(&work->list, &vblank->vblank_work.work_list);
> > > + work->state = DRM_VBL_WORK_SCHEDULED;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * drm_handle_vblank - handle a vblank event
> > > * @dev: DRM device
> > > @@ -1866,6 +1992,7 @@ bool drm_handle_vblank(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > unsigned int pipe)
> > >
> > > spin_unlock(&dev->vblank_time_lock);
> > >
> > > + drm_handle_vblank_works(vblank);
> > > wake_up(&vblank->queue);
> > >
> > > /* With instant-off, we defer disabling the interrupt until after
> > > @@ -2076,3 +2203,198 @@ int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct
> > > drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > > kfree(e);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * drm_vblank_work_schedule - schedule a vblank work
> > > + * @work: vblank work to schedule
> > > + * @count: target vblank count
> > > + * @nextonmiss: defer until the next vblank if target vblank was missed
> > > + *
> > > + * Schedule @work for execution once the crtc vblank count reaches
> > > @count.
> > > + *
> > > + * If the crtc vblank count has already reached @count and @nextonmiss
> > > is
> > > + * %false the work starts to execute immediately.
> > > + *
> > > + * If the crtc vblank count has already reached @count and @nextonmiss
> > > is
> > > + * %true the work is deferred until the next vblank (as if @count has
> > > been
> > > + * specified as crtc vblank count + 1).
> > > + *
> > > + * If @work is already scheduled, this function will reschedule said
> > > work
> > > + * using the new @count.
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns:
> > > + * 0 on success, error code on failure.
> > > + */
> > > +int drm_vblank_work_schedule(struct drm_vblank_work *work,
> > > + u64 count, bool nextonmiss)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = work->vblank;
> > > + unsigned long irqflags;
> > > + u64 cur_vbl;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > + bool rescheduling = false;
> > > + bool passed;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblank->dev->event_lock, irqflags);
> > > +
> > > + if (work->cancel)
> > > + goto out;
> > > +
> > > + if (work->state == DRM_VBL_WORK_RUNNING) {
> > > + work->reschedule = true;
> > > + work->count = count;
> > > + goto out;
> > > + } else if (work->state != DRM_VBL_WORK_IDLE) {
> > > + if (work->count == count)
> > > + goto out;
> > > + rescheduling = true;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (work->state != DRM_VBL_WORK_WAITING) {
> > > + ret = drm_vblank_get(vblank->dev, vblank->pipe);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + work->count = count;
> > > +
> > > + cur_vbl = atomic64_read(&vblank->count);
> > > + passed = vblank_passed(cur_vbl, count);
> > > + if (passed)
> > > + DRM_ERROR("crtc %d vblank %llu already passed (current
> > > %llu)\n",
> > > + vblank->pipe, count, cur_vbl);
> > > +
> > > + if (!nextonmiss && passed) {
> > > + drm_vblank_put(vblank->dev, vblank->pipe);
> > > + if (rescheduling)
> > > + list_move_tail(&work->list,
> > > + &vblank->vblank_work.work_list);
> > > + else
> > > + list_add_tail(&work->list,
> > > + &vblank->vblank_work.work_list);
> > > + work->state = DRM_VBL_WORK_SCHEDULED;
> > > + wake_up_all(&vblank->queue);
> > > + } else {
> > > + if (rescheduling)
> > > + list_move_tail(&work->list,
> > > + &vblank->vblank_work.irq_list);
> > > + else
> > > + list_add_tail(&work->list,
> > > + &vblank->vblank_work.irq_list);
> > > + work->state = DRM_VBL_WORK_WAITING;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + out:
> > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblank->dev->event_lock, irqflags);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vblank_work_schedule);
> > > +
> > > +static bool vblank_work_cancel(struct drm_vblank_work *work)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = work->vblank;
> > > +
> > > + switch (work->state) {
> > > + case DRM_VBL_WORK_RUNNING:
> > > + work->cancel = true;
> > > + work->reschedule = false;
> > > + /* fall through */
> > > + default:
> > > + case DRM_VBL_WORK_IDLE:
> > > + return false;
> > > + case DRM_VBL_WORK_WAITING:
> > > + drm_vblank_put(vblank->dev, vblank->pipe);
> > > + /* fall through */
> > > + case DRM_VBL_WORK_SCHEDULED:
> > > + list_del_init(&work->list);
> > > + work->state = DRM_VBL_WORK_IDLE;
> > > + return true;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * drm_vblank_work_cancel - cancel a vblank work
> > > + * @work: vblank work to cancel
> > > + *
> > > + * Cancel an already scheduled vblank work.
> > > + *
> > > + * On return @work may still be executing, unless the return
> > > + * value is %true.
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns:
> > > + * True if the work was cancelled before it started to excute, false
> > > otherwise.
> > > + */
> > > +bool drm_vblank_work_cancel(struct drm_vblank_work *work)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = work->vblank;
> > > + bool cancelled;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_irq(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + cancelled = vblank_work_cancel(work);
> > > +
> > > + spin_unlock_irq(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + return cancelled;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vblank_work_cancel);
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * drm_vblank_work_cancel_sync - cancel a vblank work and wait for it
> > > to
> > > finish executing
> > > + * @work: vblank work to cancel
> > > + *
> > > + * Cancel an already scheduled vblank work and wait for its
> > > + * execution to finish.
> > > + *
> > > + * On return @work is no longer guaraneed to be executing.
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns:
> > > + * True if the work was cancelled before it started to excute, false
> > > otherwise.
> > > + */
> > > +bool drm_vblank_work_cancel_sync(struct drm_vblank_work *work)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = work->vblank;
> > > + bool cancelled;
> > > + long ret;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_irq(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + cancelled = vblank_work_cancel(work);
> > > +
> > > + ret = wait_event_lock_irq_timeout(vblank->vblank_work.work_wait,
> > > + work->state == DRM_VBL_WORK_IDLE,
> > > + vblank->dev->event_lock,
> > > + 10 * HZ);
> > > +
> > > + spin_unlock_irq(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + WARN(!ret, "crtc %d vblank work timed out\n", vblank->pipe);
> > > +
> > > + return cancelled;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vblank_work_cancel_sync);
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * drm_vblank_work_flush - wait for a scheduled vblank work to finish
> > > excuting
> > > + * @work: vblank work to flush
> > > + *
> > > + * Wait until @work has finished executing.
> > > + */
> > > +void drm_vblank_work_flush(struct drm_vblank_work *work)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = work->vblank;
> > > + long ret;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_irq(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + ret = wait_event_lock_irq_timeout(vblank->vblank_work.work_wait,
> > > + work->state == DRM_VBL_WORK_IDLE,
> > > + vblank->dev->event_lock,
> > > + 10 * HZ);
> > > +
> > > + spin_unlock_irq(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
> > > +
> > > + WARN(!ret, "crtc %d vblank work timed out\n", vblank->pipe);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vblank_work_flush);
> > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_vblank.h b/include/drm/drm_vblank.h
> > > index dd9f5b9e56e4..ac9130f419af 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/drm_vblank.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_vblank.h
> > > @@ -203,8 +203,42 @@ struct drm_vblank_crtc {
> > > * disabling functions multiple times.
> > > */
> > > bool enabled;
> > > +
> > > + struct {
> > > + struct task_struct *thread;
> > > + struct list_head irq_list, work_list;
> > > + wait_queue_head_t work_wait;
> > > + } vblank_work;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +struct drm_vblank_work {
> > > + u64 count;
> > > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank;
> > > + void (*func)(struct drm_vblank_work *work, u64 count);
> > > + struct list_head list;
> > > + enum {
> > > + DRM_VBL_WORK_IDLE,
> > > + DRM_VBL_WORK_WAITING,
> > > + DRM_VBL_WORK_SCHEDULED,
> > > + DRM_VBL_WORK_RUNNING,
> > > + } state;
> > > + bool cancel : 1;
> > > + bool reschedule : 1;
> > > };
> > >
> > > +int drm_vblank_work_schedule(struct drm_vblank_work *work,
> > > + u64 count, bool nextonmiss);
> > > +void drm_vblank_work_init(struct drm_vblank_work *work, struct drm_crtc
> > > *crtc,
> > > + void (*func)(struct drm_vblank_work *work, u64
> > > count));
> > > +bool drm_vblank_work_cancel(struct drm_vblank_work *work);
> > > +bool drm_vblank_work_cancel_sync(struct drm_vblank_work *work);
> > > +void drm_vblank_work_flush(struct drm_vblank_work *work);
> > > +
> > > +static inline bool drm_vblank_work_pending(struct drm_vblank_work
> > > *work)
> > > +{
> > > + return work->state != DRM_VBL_WORK_IDLE;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int drm_vblank_init(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int num_crtcs);
> > > bool drm_dev_has_vblank(const struct drm_device *dev);
> > > u64 drm_crtc_vblank_count(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
> > > --
> > > 2.24.1
> > >
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Associate Software Engineer at Red Hat

Next message: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [PATCH] watchdog: sp805: fix restart handler"
Previous message: Pandruvada, Srinivas: "Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] ACPI: fix: Update Tiger Lake ACPI device IDs"
In reply to: Lyude Paul: "Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/vblank: Add vblank works"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]