On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:01:19PM -0800, Hoan Tran wrote:
Hi Will,
On 2/6/20 2:23 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:55:14AM -0800, Hoan Tran wrote:
Some NUMA nodes have memory ranges that span other nodes.
Even though a pfn is valid and between a node's start and end pfns,
it may not reside on that node.
This patch enables NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES config for NUMA to support
this type of NUMA layout.
Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <Hoan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index e688dfa..939d28f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -959,6 +959,13 @@ config NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
config HOLES_IN_ZONE
def_bool y
+# Some NUMA nodes have memory ranges that span other nodes.
+# Even though a pfn is valid and between a node's start and end pfns,
+# it may not reside on that node.
+config NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES
+ def_bool y
+ depends on ACPI_NUMA
+
I thought we agreed to do this in the core code?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1562887528-5896-1-git-send-email-Hoan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, but it looks like Thomas didn't agree to apply this patch into
x86.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.1907152042110.1767@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Was it a clear statement that such change will not make it to x86 or a
request for improving the patch or the description? I'd suggest you
update the x86 patch comment to include the rationale as per your reply
to Thomas and post a new version of the generic series. If Thomas (or
the mm folk) reject it again, we'll revisit the arm64-specific thread.