Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: Enable NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES config for NUMA

From: Hoan Tran
Date: Sat Mar 28 2020 - 14:37:11 EST


Hi Catalin,


On 3/11/20 4:27 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:01:19PM -0800, Hoan Tran wrote:
Hi Will,

On 2/6/20 2:23 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:55:14AM -0800, Hoan Tran wrote:
Some NUMA nodes have memory ranges that span other nodes.
Even though a pfn is valid and between a node's start and end pfns,
it may not reside on that node.

This patch enables NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES config for NUMA to support
this type of NUMA layout.

Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <Hoan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index e688dfa..939d28f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -959,6 +959,13 @@ config NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
config HOLES_IN_ZONE
def_bool y
+# Some NUMA nodes have memory ranges that span other nodes.
+# Even though a pfn is valid and between a node's start and end pfns,
+# it may not reside on that node.
+config NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES
+ def_bool y
+ depends on ACPI_NUMA
+

I thought we agreed to do this in the core code?

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1562887528-5896-1-git-send-email-Hoan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Yes, but it looks like Thomas didn't agree to apply this patch into
x86.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.1907152042110.1767@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Was it a clear statement that such change will not make it to x86 or a
request for improving the patch or the description? I'd suggest you
update the x86 patch comment to include the rationale as per your reply
to Thomas and post a new version of the generic series. If Thomas (or
the mm folk) reject it again, we'll revisit the arm64-specific thread.

Yes, I have just sent out a new patch for mm core.

Regards
Hoan