Re: [PATCH v3] uml: make CONFIG_STATIC_LINK actually static

[Richard Weinberger]

----- UrsprÃngliche Mail -----
> Von: "anton ivanov" <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> An: "Brendan Higgins" <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Jeff Dike" <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "richard" <richard@xxxxxx>, "Geert
> Uytterhoeven" <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James McMechan" <james_mcmechan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: "linux-um" <linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "davidgow"
> <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 8. Februar 2020 08:56:58
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH v3] uml: make CONFIG_STATIC_LINK actually static

> On 08/02/2020 01:07, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 2:14 PM Brendan Higgins
>> <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Currently, CONFIG_STATIC_LINK can be enabled with options which cannot
>>> be statically linked, namely UML_NET_VECTOR, UML_NET_VDE, and
>>> UML_NET_PCAP; this is because glibc tries to load NSS which does not
>>> support being statically linked. So make CONFIG_STATIC_LINK depend on
>>> !UML_NET_VECTOR && !UML_NET_VDE && !UML_NET_PCAP.
>>>
>>> Link:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f658f317-be54-ed75-8296-c373c2dcc697@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/#t
>>> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>> 
>> Ping.
> 
> ICMP echo reply,
> 
> I thought I acked it :)
> 
> If not - apologies.

Applied, thanks!

Thanks,
//richard