[PATCH 01/18] mm/list_lru.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to local variant

[Joel Fernandes (Google)]

From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>

Rename kvfree_rcu() function to the kvfree_rcu_local()
one. The aim is to introduce the public API that would
conflict with this one.

Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/list_lru.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index 0f1f6b06b7f36..386424688f805 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -383,14 +383,14 @@ static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru)
 	struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus;
 	/*
 	 * This is called when shrinker has already been unregistered,
-	 * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu().
+	 * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu_local().
 	 */
 	memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
 	__memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(memcg_lrus, 0, memcg_nr_cache_ids);
 	kvfree(memcg_lrus);
 }
 
-static void kvfree_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
+static void kvfree_rcu_local(struct rcu_head *head)
 {
 	struct list_lru_memcg *mlru;
 
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru,
 	rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, new);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock);
 
-	call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu);
+	call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu_local);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.26.0.rc2.310.g2932bb562d-goog