Re: [RFC v3 1/8] dt-bindings: display: convert ingenic,lcd.txt to ingenic,lcd.yaml

[H. Nikolaus Schaller]

Hi Paul,

> Am 30.03.2020 um 17:42 schrieb Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 19:35:47 +0200, "H. Nikolaus Schaller" wrote:
>> and add compatible: jz4780-lcd, including an example how to
>> configure both lcd controllers.
>> 
>> Also fix the clock names and examples.
>> 
>> Based on work by Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and
>> Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>> .../bindings/display/ingenic,lcd.txt          |  45 ------
>> .../bindings/display/ingenic,lcd.yaml         | 128 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ingenic,lcd.txt
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ingenic,lcd.yaml
>> 
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> 
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ingenic,lcd.example.dt.yaml: lcd-controller@13050000: clocks: [[4294967295, 9]] is too short
> 
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1263508

If I read the message correctly, I think there should be 2 clocks specified in
the jz4725b-lcd example and not just

	clocks = <&cgu JZ4725B_CLK_LCD>;

Unfortunately the jz4725b.dtsi does not seem to be upstream or in linux-next so
I don't know if it works without lcd_pclk or not.

If there is really just one clock, we need to modify the clocks and clock-names
schema and add minItems: 1 and maxItems: 2 to allow for this flexibility.

Otherwise we have to fix the example. Do you have some git with an up-to-date
jz4725b.dtsi to look at?

> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date:
> 
> pip3 install git+https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema.git@master --upgrade

+++ :)

> 
> Please check and re-submit.

Sure, since it is a RFC.

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus