Re: [PATCH][next] mtd: ubi: ubi-media.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

[Richard Weinberger]

----- UrsprÃngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> An: "richard" <richard@xxxxxx>, "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
> <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. MÃrz 2020 23:44:35
> Betreff: [PATCH][next] mtd: ubi: ubi-media.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
> 
> struct foo {
>        int stuff;
>        struct boo array[];
> };
> 
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
> 
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
> 
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
> 
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied. Thanks!

Thanks,
//richard