Re: [PATCH v3,0/4] drivers: uio: new driver uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram

[Christophe Leroy]

Le 16/04/2020 Ã 11:29, çæè a ÃcritÂ:
> Hi,
> Seems there is something wrong with the server that multiple dumplications
> of the v3 patches were sent out, please ignore the rest and take this newest
> series as formal count.

Which series ?

It seems you sent 3 times, at 9:29, 9:41 and 9:49 (Paris Time)

From the series of 9:29, I received patches 0 to 3
From the series of 9:41, I received patches 0 to 3
From the series of 9:49, I received patches 0 and 4.

Looks like powerpc patchwork 
(https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?submitter=78320) 
got:
From the series of 9:29, I received patches 0 to 4
From the series of 9:41, I received patches 1 to 4
From the series of 9:49, I received patches 1 to 4

So this seems to be something wrong somewhere.

Christophe


> Thanks,
> Wenhu
>
> From: Wang Wenhu <wenhu.wang@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2020-04-16 15:49:14
> To:  gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,oss@xxxxxxxxxxxx,christophe.leroy@xxxxxx,linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc:  kernel@xxxxxxxx,Wang Wenhu <wenhu.wang@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH v3,0/4] drivers: uio: new driver uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram>This series add a new uio driver for freescale 85xx platforms to
> > access the Cache-Sram form user level. This is extremely helpful
> > for the user-space applications that require high performance memory
> > accesses.
> >
> > It fixes the compile errors and warning of the hardware level drivers
> > and implements the uio driver in uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > * Addressed comments from Greg K-H
> > * Moved kfree(info->name) into uio_info_free_internal()
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > * Drop the patch that modifies Kconfigs of arch/powerpc/platforms
> >    and modified the sequence of patches:
> >     01:dropped, 02->03, 03->02, 04->01, 05->04
> > * Addressed comments from Greg, Scott and Christophe
> > * Use "uiomem->internal_addr" as if condition for sram memory free,
> >    and memset the uiomem entry
> > * Modified of_match_table make the driver apart from Cache-Sram HW info
> >    which belong to the HW level driver fsl_85xx_cache_sram to match
> > * Use roundup_pow_of_two for align calc(really learned a lot from Christophe)
> > * Remove useless clear block of uiomem entries.
> > * Use UIO_INFO_VER micro for info->version, and define it as
> >    "devicetree,pseudo", meaning this is pseudo device and probed from
> >    device tree configuration
> > * Select FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM rather than depends on it
> >
> > Wang Wenhu (4):
> >   powerpc: sysdev: fix compile error for fsl_85xx_l2ctlr
> >   powerpc: sysdev: fix compile error for fsl_85xx_cache_sram
> >   powerpc: sysdev: fix compile warning for fsl_85xx_cache_sram
> >   drivers: uio: new driver for fsl_85xx_cache_sram
> >
> > arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c |   3 +-
> > arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c     |   1 +
> > drivers/uio/Kconfig                       |   9 ++
> > drivers/uio/Makefile                      |   1 +
> > drivers/uio/uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c     | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/uio/uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1