Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: lpddr: Replace printk with pr_notice

[Joe Perches]

On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 14:10 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> 
> On 4/27/20 14:01, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 14:03 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > pr_notice is preferred over printk.
> > 
> > So is coalescing formats
> > 
> > ? diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
> > []
> > > @@ -127,31 +127,31 @@ static inline void print_drs_error(unsigned dsr)
> > >  	int prog_status = (dsr & DSR_RPS) >> 8;
> > >  
> > >  	if (!(dsr & DSR_AVAILABLE))
> > > -		printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> > > +		pr_notice("DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> > >  	if ((prog_status & 0x03) == 0x03)
> > > -		printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> > > +		pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> > >  						"half with 41h command\n");
> > 
> > 		pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid half with 41h command\n");
> > 
> 
> I didn't want to mess with the rest of format, because some maintainers
> don't like that. If Miquel is OK with that, I can fix that up, too.

He should.  Coalescing is part of coding-style.

"never break user-visible strings such as printk messages"

cheers, Joe