Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: lpddr: Replace printk with pr_notice

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Gustavo,

"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 27 Apr
2020 14:10:36 -0500:

> On 4/27/20 14:01, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 14:03 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:  
> >> pr_notice is preferred over printk.  
> > 
> > So is coalescing formats
> > 
> > ? diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
> > []  
> >> @@ -127,31 +127,31 @@ static inline void print_drs_error(unsigned dsr)
> >>  	int prog_status = (dsr & DSR_RPS) >> 8;
> >>  
> >>  	if (!(dsr & DSR_AVAILABLE))
> >> -		printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> >> +		pr_notice("DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> >>  	if ((prog_status & 0x03) == 0x03)
> >> -		printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> >> +		pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> >>  						"half with 41h command\n");  
> > 
> > 		pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid half with 41h command\n");
> >   
> 
> I didn't want to mess with the rest of format, because some maintainers
> don't like that. If Miquel is OK with that, I can fix that up, too.
> 
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo

I'm fine with it in this case, just mention it in the commit log,
please.

Thanks,
MiquÃl