Re: [PATCH v29 00/20] Intel SGX foundations

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 01:14 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 17:42 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > Tested on Enarx. This requires a patch[0] for v29 support.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thank you. Update in my tree.
> 
> Sean, I'll fixed that whitespace issue too in my tree.
> 
> General question: maybe it would be easiest that I issue a pull request
> once everyone feels that the series is ready to be pulled and stop sending
> new versions of the series?

My honest feelings about the series ATM are:

1. It is not perfect like no code never is and there are always issues.
2. Some things are very well matured, even more so than in a lot of mainline
   code I've seen. I'm particularly happy how the locking code has been
   converged.
3. Not worried to maintain the code in its current state. It is manageable.

/Jarkko