Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] usb: gadget: udc: atmel: add usb device support for SAM9x60 SoC

[Cristian.Birsan]

On 5/15/20 6:02 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 15/05/2020 14:16:24+0300, cristian.birsan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Cristian Birsan <cristian.birsan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch set adds usb device support for SAM9x60 SoC.
>> The DPRAM memory for the USB High Speed Device Port (UDPHS) hardware
>> block was increased and the allocation method is changed. This patch
>> series simplifies the endpoint allocation scheme to acomodate this SoC
>> and the old ones.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - drop the patch that adds reference to pmc for sam9x60
>> - use dt-bindings: usb prefix
>> - enable usb device in device tree
>>
>> Claudiu Beznea (1):
>>   usb: gadget: udc: atmel: use of_find_matching_node_and_match
>>
>> Cristian Birsan (6):
>>   dt-bindings: usb: atmel: Update DT bindings documentation for sam9x60
>>   usb: gadget: udc: atmel: simplify endpoint allocation
>>   usb: gadget: udc: atmel: use 1 bank endpoints for control transfers
>>   usb: gadget: udc: atmel: rename errata into caps
>>   usb: gadget: udc: atmel: update endpoint allocation for sam9x60
>>   ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60ek: enable usb device
> 
> This should probably be rebased on top of
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200507155651.1094142-1-gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> so we avoid having to define the endpoints in the device tree in the
> first place.

I know the patch series and I Ack-ed it some time ago. On the other hand, it was not applied yet,
so to be consistent I created this series based on what is already available on usb-next.
Depending on which one gets applied first, the other will need to rebase. I have no problem with that.
The end goal is to have both of them.

Cristian

> 
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
>