Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 24 [build failure on arm64]

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 24/06/2020 11:55, Will Deacon wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> > index 1e5a940532da..97d3d3632093 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> > @@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ btildflags-$(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL) += -z force-bti
> >  # potential future proofing if we end up with internal calls to the exported
> >  # routines, as x86 does (see 6f121e548f83 ("x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so
> >  # preparation in build-time C")).
> > -ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv \
> > -               -Bsymbolic --no-eh-frame-hdr --build-id -n $(btildflags-y) -T
> > +ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv       \
> > +            -Bsymbolic $(call ld-option, --no-eh-frame-hdr) --build-id -n      \
> > +            $(btildflags-y) -T
> >  
> >  ccflags-y := -fno-common -fno-builtin -fno-stack-protector -ffixed-x18
> >  ccflags-y += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > 
> 
> 
> I am seeing the same build failure and the above does fix it for me.

Cheers, Jon. I'll get this into -next with your Tested-by.

Will