Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 24 [build failure on arm64]

[Jon Hunter]

On 24/06/2020 13:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 24/06/2020 11:55, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
>>> index 1e5a940532da..97d3d3632093 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
>>> @@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ btildflags-$(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL) += -z force-bti
>>>  # potential future proofing if we end up with internal calls to the exported
>>>  # routines, as x86 does (see 6f121e548f83 ("x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so
>>>  # preparation in build-time C")).
>>> -ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv \
>>> -               -Bsymbolic --no-eh-frame-hdr --build-id -n $(btildflags-y) -T
>>> +ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv       \
>>> +            -Bsymbolic $(call ld-option, --no-eh-frame-hdr) --build-id -n      \
>>> +            $(btildflags-y) -T
>>>  
>>>  ccflags-y := -fno-common -fno-builtin -fno-stack-protector -ffixed-x18
>>>  ccflags-y += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am seeing the same build failure and the above does fix it for me.
> 
> Cheers, Jon. I'll get this into -next with your Tested-by.

Thanks, that will be great.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic