Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: imx6plus: enable internal routing of clk_enet_ref where possible
From: Sven Van Asbroeck
Date: Mon Jun 29 2020 - 15:38:33 EST
Hi Fabio,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 9:10 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have tested this series on an imx6qp sabresd and unfortunately, it
> breaks Ethernet as I can no longer get an IP address from the DHCP
> server.
Thank you for testing this out on a different platform !
I had a look at how things are done in the Freescale fork of the kernel
(5.4.24_2.1.0) and I noticed that this kernel has almost the same
behaviour as this proposed patch: the GPR5 bit is _always_ set
on a plus. The code does not check how the enet clock is generated.
https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/linux-imx/tree/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c?h=rel_imx_5.4.24_2.1.0&id=babac008e5cf168abca1a85bda2e8071ca27a5c0#n269
Now, I'm assuming that the sabresd-plus can run on the Freescale
kernel fork. The GPR5 bit will always be set there.
So why won't mainline work with this patch? What have I overlooked?
I'm sure you've checked that sabresd ethernet works ok on mainline
even without this patch?