Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: imx6plus: enable internal routing of clk_enet_ref where possible
From: Fabio Estevam
Date: Mon Jun 29 2020 - 17:01:44 EST
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:40 AM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you for testing this out on a different platform !
>
> I had a look at how things are done in the Freescale fork of the kernel
> (5.4.24_2.1.0) and I noticed that this kernel has almost the same
> behaviour as this proposed patch: the GPR5 bit is _always_ set
> on a plus. The code does not check how the enet clock is generated.
>
> https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/linux-imx/tree/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c?h=rel_imx_5.4.24_2.1.0&id=babac008e5cf168abca1a85bda2e8071ca27a5c0#n269
>
> Now, I'm assuming that the sabresd-plus can run on the Freescale
> kernel fork. The GPR5 bit will always be set there.
Just tested 5.4.24_2.1.0 on an imx6qp sabresd and DHCP also fails there.