Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Explicitly include linux/major.h where it is needed

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Greg,

On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:58:43 +0200 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:27:47AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > This is in preparation for removing the include of major.h where it is
> > not needed.
> > 
> > These files were found using
> > 
> > 	grep -E -L '[<"](uapi/)?linux/major\.h' $(git grep -l -w -f /tmp/xx)
> > 
> > where /tmp/xx contains all the symbols defined in major.h.  There were
> > a couple of files in that list that did not need the include since the
> > references are in comments.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
> 
> Any reason this had an RFC, but patch 2/2 did not?
> 
> They look good to me, I will be glad to take these, but do you still
> want reviews from others for this?  It seems simple enough to me...

I am going to do another round of this patchset splitting out most of
the "safe" removals that can be done anytime so other maintainers can
take them.  Then there will be the left over order dependent changes at
the end.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpGhp4oyGZgi.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature