Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] tmpfs: Per-superblock i_ino support

[Chris Down]

Matthew Wilcox writes:
> I don't think that works.  I think you meant to write ~(SHMEM_INO_BATCH - 1).
> Or just ino % SHMEM_INO_BATCH which works even for non-power-of-two.

Er, right. I now wonder why I didn't just write `ino % SHMEM_INO_BATCH` :-)

I'll send again with that fix.