Re: [PATCH] riscv: Setup exception vector for K210 properly

From: Damien Le Moal
Date: Tue Aug 11 2020 - 03:44:58 EST


On 2020/08/11 16:06, 邱文博 wrote:
> The serial port did not print anything after early console.
>
> [ 0.000000] Sorting __ex_table...
> [ 0.000000] mem auto-init: stack:off, heap alloc:off, heap free:off
> [ 0.000000] Memory: 6480K/8192K available (1024K kernel code, 111K rwdata, 170K rodata, 101K init, 97K bss, 1712K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
> [ 0.000000] rcu: Hierarchical RCU implementation.
> [ 0.000000] rcu: RCU calculated value of scheduler-enlistment delay is 25 jiffies.
> [ 0.000000] NR_IRQS: 64, nr_irqs: 64, preallocated irqs: 0
> [ 0.000000] riscv-intc: 64 local interrupts mapped
> [ 0.000000] plic: interrupt-controller@c000000: mapped 65 interrupts with 2 handlers for 4 contexts.
> [ 0.000000] random: get_random_bytes called from 0x00000000800019a4 with crng_init=0
> [ 0.000000] riscv_timer_init_dt: Registering clocksource cpuid [0] hartid [0]
> [ 0.000000] clocksource: riscv_clocksource: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x3990be68b, max_idle_ns: 881590404272 ns
> [ 0.000015] sched_clock: 64 bits at 7MHz, resolution 128ns, wraps every 4398046511054ns
> [ 0.008254] Console: colour dummy device 80x25

Interesting. Never saw that happening... Thanks !

>
>
>
> > -----原始邮件-----
> &gt; 发件人: "Damien Le Moal" <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
> &gt; 发送时间: 2020-08-11 14:42:15 (星期二)
> &gt; 收件人: "Qiu Wenbo" <qiuwenbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> &gt; 抄送: "Albert Ou" <aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Atish Patra" <atish.patra@xxxxxxx>, "Anup
> &gt; Patel" <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Guo Ren" <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zong Li" <zong.li@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Greentime Hu" <greentime.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Vincent Chen" <vincent.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> &gt; 主题: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Setup exception vector for K210 properly
> &gt;
> &gt; On 2020/08/11 15:38, Qiu Wenbo wrote:
> &gt; &gt; Exception vector is missing on nommu platform and it is a big issue.
> &gt; &gt; This patch is tested in Sipeed MAIX Bit Dev Board.
> &gt; &gt;
> &gt; &gt; Fixes: 79b1feba5455 ("RISC-V: Setup exception vector early")
> &gt; &gt; Signed-off-by: Qiu Wenbo <qiuwenbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> &gt; &gt; ---
> &gt; &gt; arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 1 +
> &gt; &gt; arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> &gt; &gt; 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> &gt; &gt;
> &gt; &gt; diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> &gt; &gt; index 356825a57551..23cde0ceb39d 100644
> &gt; &gt; --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> &gt; &gt; +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> &gt; &gt; @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void smp_callin(void)
> &gt; &gt; mmgrab(mm);
> &gt; &gt; current-&gt;active_mm = mm;
> &gt; &gt;
> &gt; &gt; + trap_init();
> &gt; &gt; notify_cpu_starting(curr_cpuid);
> &gt; &gt; update_siblings_masks(curr_cpuid);
> &gt; &gt; set_cpu_online(curr_cpuid, 1);
> &gt; &gt; diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> &gt; &gt; index ad14f4466d92..a390239818ae 100644
> &gt; &gt; --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> &gt; &gt; +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> &gt; &gt; @@ -174,7 +174,16 @@ int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long pc)
> &gt; &gt; }
> &gt; &gt; #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG */
> &gt; &gt;
> &gt; &gt; -/* stvec &amp; scratch is already set from head.S */
> &gt; &gt; +/* stvec &amp; scratch is already set from head.S when mmu is enabled */
> &gt; &gt; void trap_init(void)
> &gt; &gt; {
> &gt; &gt; +#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
> &gt; &gt; + /*
> &gt; &gt; + * Set sup0 scratch register to 0, indicating to exception vector
> &gt; &gt; + * that we are presently executing in the kernel
> &gt; &gt; + */
> &gt; &gt; + csr_write(CSR_SCRATCH, 0);
> &gt; &gt; + /* Set the exception vector address */
> &gt; &gt; + csr_write(CSR_TVEC, &amp;handle_exception);
> &gt; &gt; +#endif
> &gt; &gt; }
> &gt; &gt;
> &gt;
> &gt; Looks OK to me. But out of curiosity, how did you trigger a problem ? I never
> &gt; got any weird exceptions with my busybox userspace.
> &gt;
> &gt; --
> &gt; Damien Le Moal
> &gt; Western Digital Research
> </qiuwenbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx></linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></vincent.chen@xxxxxxxxxx></greentime.hu@xxxxxxxxxx></zong.li@xxxxxxxxxx></guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx></atish.patra@xxxxxxx></aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx></palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx></qiuwenbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx></damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
>


--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research