Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] extcon: extcon-ptn5150: Add the USB external connector support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:18:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:51:37AM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> > On 25/8/2020 4:19 pm, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:45:38PM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> > > > On 19/8/2020 3:55 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 8:38 AM Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
> > > > > <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > On 18/8/2020 4:40 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 02:57:18PM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> > > > > > > > USB external connector chip PTN5150 used on the Intel LGM SoC
> > > > > > > > boards to detect the USB type and connection.
> > > > > > > Internally I meant you can send cleanups, but couple of patches here are the
> > > > > > > features and were still under discussion... But here we are.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > you mean asking us to implement the Heikki suggested as below..
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Heikki Krogerus: register the port and the partner attached to it with
> > > > > > the USB Type-C connector class in the driver. Is my understaanding
> > > > > > right? if not, please explain it. Thanks!
> > > > > 
> > > > > When you mention somebody, don't forget to Cc them (now done by me).
> > > > Sure, Thank you
> > > 
> > > So the patches 1-5 are fine. The rest needs to be rewritten.
> > Already Krzysztof submitted all the patches and got approved, so we started
> > sending only one patch which support to Intel LGM SoC based boards, Thanks!
> 
> I'm not sure what you meant by above.
> 
> Krzysztof suggested you to squash all first patches into 1 (or two) and he
> approves it. What you have to do is follow his advise and send v2 where it will
> be one (or two) patch with his tag attached.
> 
> Krzysztof, is it correct what I'm saying?

Yes, correct. I guess Vadivel mentioned my patchset which was sent some
days before and recently got applied into extcon tree.

I think there is no misunderstanding here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof