Re: [RFT 06/11] mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Simplify with optional clock and dev_err_probe()
From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Thu Sep 03 2020 - 04:11:49 EST
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 21:58, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/2/2020 12:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Only -ENOENT from devm_clk_get() means that clock is not present in
> > device tree. Other errors have their own meaning and should not be
> > ignored.
> >
> > Simplify getting the clock which is in fact optional and also use
> > dev_err_probe() for handling deferred.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is actually an open coded version of devm_clk_get_optional(), so
> this is fine:
devm_clk_get_optional() treats -ENOENT specifically, so it's not an
exact open coded version. I think that's why Krzysztof prefered to get
it tested on HW.
>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!
I am queuing this up for next, without waiting for explicit tests .
There is time to get that from testing in linux-next anyway.
Kind regards
Uffe