RE: [PATCH 0/7] ASoC: soundwire: Move sdw stream operations to

[Liao, Bard]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:11 PM
> To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; alsa-devel@alsa-
> project.org; tiwai@xxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ranjani.sridharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> hui.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; broonie@xxxxxxxxxx;
> srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx; jank@xxxxxxxxxxx; Lin, Mengdong
> <mengdong.lin@xxxxxxxxx>; Kale, Sanyog R <sanyog.r.kale@xxxxxxxxx>;
> rander.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Liao, Bard <bard.liao@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ASoC: soundwire: Move sdw stream operations to
> 
> On 03-09-20, 09:05, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9/3/20 5:42 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > On 01-09-20, 23:02, Bard Liao wrote:
> > > > sdw stream operation APIs can be called once per stream. dailink
> > > > callbacks are good places to call these APIs.
> > >
> > > Again, please mention here if this is to be merged thru sdw tree or
> > > ASoC tree
> >
> > Good point, I thought it wouldn't matter but it does. I just gave it a
> > try and there seems to be a conflict on Mark's tree w/
> > drivers/soundwire/intel.c (likely due to missing patches already added to
> Vinod's tree).
> >
> > So this should go to Vinod's tree with Mark's Acked-by tag on the ASoC
> > changes.
> >
> > Alternatively we can also split this in two, with ASoC-only and
> > SoundWire-only patches in separate series if it's easier for
> > maintainers. We would lose the rationale for the changes but that's not
> essential.
> 
> If there are no dependencies on each other, that is best preferred option.
> One should mention in cover-letter about the linked series though.

Sent as v2