Re: [PATCH v1 10/12] fpga: enable sec-mgr update cancel
From: Tom Rix
Date: Sun Sep 06 2020 - 13:00:58 EST
On 9/4/20 4:53 PM, Russ Weight wrote:
> Extend the Intel Security Manager class driver to include
> an update/cancel sysfs file that can be written to request
> that an update be canceled. The write may return EBUSY if
> the update has progressed to the point that it cannot be
> canceled by software or ENODEV if there is no update in
> progress.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-ifpga-sec-mgr | 10 ++++
> drivers/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-ifpga-sec-mgr b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-ifpga-sec-mgr
> index cf1967f1b3e3..762a7dee9453 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-ifpga-sec-mgr
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-ifpga-sec-mgr
> @@ -87,6 +87,16 @@ Description: Write only. Write the filename of an Intel image
> and Root Entry Hashes, and to cancel Code Signing
> Keys (CSK).
>
> +What: /sys/class/ifpga_sec_mgr/ifpga_secX/update/cancel
> +Date: Sep 2020
> +KernelVersion: 5.10
> +Contact: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@xxxxxxxxx>
> +Description: Write-only. Write a "1" to this file to request
> + that a current update be canceled. This request
> + will be rejected (EBUSY) if the programming phase
> + has already started or (ENODEV) if there is no
> + update in progress.
> +
> What: /sys/class/ifpga_sec_mgr/ifpga_secX/update/status
> Date: Sep 2020
> KernelVersion: 5.10
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.c b/drivers/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.c
> index 4ca5d13e5656..afd97c135ebe 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,23 @@ static void ifpga_sec_dev_error(struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr,
> imgr->iops->cancel(imgr);
> }
>
> +static int progress_transition(struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr,
> + enum ifpga_sec_prog new_progress)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&imgr->lock);
> + if (imgr->request_cancel) {
> + set_error(imgr, IFPGA_SEC_ERR_CANCELED);
> + imgr->iops->cancel(imgr);
check cancel() for double error ?
should request_cancel be cleared ?
> + ret = -ECANCELED;
> + } else {
> + update_progress(imgr, new_progress);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&imgr->lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void progress_complete(struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr)
> {
> mutex_lock(&imgr->lock);
> @@ -190,16 +207,20 @@ static void ifpga_sec_mgr_update(struct work_struct *work)
> goto release_fw_exit;
> }
>
> - update_progress(imgr, IFPGA_SEC_PROG_PREPARING);
> + if (progress_transition(imgr, IFPGA_SEC_PROG_PREPARING))
> + goto modput_exit;
> +
> ret = imgr->iops->prepare(imgr);
> if (ret) {
> ifpga_sec_dev_error(imgr, ret);
> goto modput_exit;
> }
>
> - update_progress(imgr, IFPGA_SEC_PROG_WRITING);
> + if (progress_transition(imgr, IFPGA_SEC_PROG_WRITING))
> + goto done;
> +
> size = imgr->remaining_size;
> - while (size) {
> + while (size && !imgr->request_cancel) {
> blk_size = min_t(u32, size, WRITE_BLOCK_SIZE);
> size -= blk_size;
> ret = imgr->iops->write_blk(imgr, offset, blk_size);
> @@ -212,7 +233,9 @@ static void ifpga_sec_mgr_update(struct work_struct *work)
> offset += blk_size;
> }
>
> - update_progress(imgr, IFPGA_SEC_PROG_PROGRAMMING);
> + if (progress_transition(imgr, IFPGA_SEC_PROG_PROGRAMMING))
> + goto done;
> +
> ret = imgr->iops->poll_complete(imgr);
> if (ret) {
> ifpga_sec_dev_error(imgr, ret);
> @@ -359,6 +382,7 @@ static ssize_t filename_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> imgr->filename[strlen(imgr->filename) - 1] = '\0';
>
> imgr->err_code = IFPGA_SEC_ERR_NONE;
> + imgr->request_cancel = false;
> imgr->progress = IFPGA_SEC_PROG_READ_FILE;
> reinit_completion(&imgr->update_done);
> schedule_work(&imgr->work);
> @@ -369,8 +393,32 @@ static ssize_t filename_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(filename);
>
> +static ssize_t cancel_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr = to_sec_mgr(dev);
> + bool cancel;
> + int ret = 0;
int ret = count;
> +
> + if (kstrtobool(buf, &cancel) || !cancel)
This does not match your description in the testing section.
kstrtobool has many other valid inputs.
maybe check if count is 1 and buf[0] == '1'
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&imgr->lock);
> + if (imgr->progress == IFPGA_SEC_PROG_PROGRAMMING)
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + else if (imgr->progress == IFPGA_SEC_PROG_IDLE)
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + else
> + imgr->request_cancel = true;
> + mutex_unlock(&imgr->lock);
> +
> + return ret ? : count;
return ret;
Tom
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(cancel);
> +
> static struct attribute *sec_mgr_update_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_filename.attr,
> + &dev_attr_cancel.attr,
> &dev_attr_status.attr,
> &dev_attr_error.attr,
> &dev_attr_remaining_size.attr,
> @@ -536,6 +584,9 @@ void ifpga_sec_mgr_unregister(struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr)
> goto unregister;
> }
>
> + if (imgr->progress != IFPGA_SEC_PROG_PROGRAMMING)
> + imgr->request_cancel = true;
> +
> mutex_unlock(&imgr->lock);
> wait_for_completion(&imgr->update_done);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.h b/include/linux/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.h
> index f04bf9e30c67..f51ed663a723 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.h
> @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ struct ifpga_sec_mgr {
> enum ifpga_sec_prog progress;
> enum ifpga_sec_prog err_state; /* progress state at time of failure */
> enum ifpga_sec_err err_code; /* security manager error code */
> + bool request_cancel;
> bool driver_unload;
> void *priv;
> };