Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] dt-bindings: mtd: gpmi-nand: Fix matching of clocks on different SoCs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:36:39PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:25 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Driver requires different amount of clocks for different SoCs.  Describe
> > these requirements properly to fix dtbs_check warnings like:
> >
> >     arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-beacon-kit.dt.yaml: nand-controller@33002000: clock-names:1: 'gpmi_apb' was expected
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > 1. Do not require order of clocks (use pattern).
> 
> To the extent that you can, you should fix the order in dts files
> first. If we just adjust the schemas to match the dts files, then
> what's the point?

The DTSes do not have mixed order of clocks between each other, as fair
as I remember. It was fix after Sasha Hauer comment that order is not
necessarily good.

We have the clock-names property, why enforcing the order?

> 
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmi-nand.yaml    | 76 +++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmi-nand.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmi-nand.yaml
> > index 28ff8c581837..e08e0a50929e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmi-nand.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmi-nand.yaml
> > @@ -9,9 +9,6 @@ title: Freescale General-Purpose Media Interface (GPMI) binding
> >  maintainers:
> >    - Han Xu <han.xu@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > -allOf:
> > -  - $ref: "nand-controller.yaml"
> > -
> >  description: |
> >    The GPMI nand controller provides an interface to control the NAND
> >    flash chips. The device tree may optionally contain sub-nodes
> > @@ -58,22 +55,10 @@ properties:
> >    clocks:
> >      minItems: 1
> >      maxItems: 5
> > -    items:
> > -      - description: SoC gpmi io clock
> > -      - description: SoC gpmi apb clock
> > -      - description: SoC gpmi bch clock
> > -      - description: SoC gpmi bch apb clock
> > -      - description: SoC per1 bch clock
> >
> >    clock-names:
> >      minItems: 1
> >      maxItems: 5
> > -    items:
> > -      - const: gpmi_io
> > -      - const: gpmi_apb
> > -      - const: gpmi_bch
> > -      - const: gpmi_bch_apb
> > -      - const: per1_bch
> >
> >    fsl,use-minimum-ecc:
> >      type: boolean
> > @@ -107,6 +92,67 @@ required:
> >
> >  unevaluatedProperties: false
> >
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: "nand-controller.yaml"
> > +
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - fsl,imx23-gpmi-nand
> > +              - fsl,imx28-gpmi-nand
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        clocks:
> > +          items:
> > +            - description: SoC gpmi io clock
> > +        clock-names:
> > +          items:
> > +            - const: gpmi_io
> > +
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - fsl,imx6q-gpmi-nand
> > +              - fsl,imx6sx-gpmi-nand
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        clocks:
> > +          items:
> > +            - description: SoC gpmi io clock
> > +            - description: SoC gpmi apb clock
> > +            - description: SoC gpmi bch clock
> > +            - description: SoC gpmi bch apb clock
> > +            - description: SoC per1 bch clock
> > +        clock-names:
> > +          items:
> > +            - pattern: "^(gpmi_(io|apb|bch|bch_apb)|per1_bch)$"
> > +            - pattern: "^(gpmi_(io|apb|bch|bch_apb)|per1_bch)$"
> > +            - pattern: "^(gpmi_(io|apb|bch|bch_apb)|per1_bch)$"
> > +            - pattern: "^(gpmi_(io|apb|bch|bch_apb)|per1_bch)$"
> > +            - pattern: "^(gpmi_(io|apb|bch|bch_apb)|per1_bch)$"
> 
> BTW, you can make 'items' a schema rather than a list to apply a
> constraint to all entries:
> 
> maxItems: 5
> items:
>   pattern: "^(gpmi_(io|apb|bch|bch_apb)|per1_bch)$"

Right, I forgot about such syntax.

> 
> > +
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            const: fsl,imx7d-gpmi-nand
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        clocks:
> > +          items:
> > +            - description: SoC gpmi io clock
> > +            - description: SoC gpmi bch apb clock
> > +        clock-names:
> > +          minItems: 2
> > +          maxItems: 2
> 
> You can drop these. It's the default based on the size of 'items'.

Sure.

> 
> > +          items:
> > +            - pattern: "^gpmi_(io|bch_apb)$"
> > +            - pattern: "^gpmi_(io|bch_apb)$"
> 
> Surely here we can define the order.

Yes, but still the same question as before - do we want the order? Why
enforcing it?

Best regards,
Krzysztof