Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Add UEFI support for RISC-V

From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Wed Sep 09 2020 - 03:29:40 EST


On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 04:16, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:20:27 PDT (-0700), Atish Patra wrote:
> > This series adds UEFI support for RISC-V.
> >
> > Linux kernel: v5.9-rc2
> > U-Boot: v2020.07
> > OpenSBI: master
> >
> > Patch 1-3 are generic riscv feature addition required for UEFI support.
> > Patch 4-7 adds the efi stub support for RISC-V which was reviewed few months back.
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-efi/msg19144.html
> > Patch 8 just renames arm-init code so that it can be used across different
> > architectures.
> > Patch 9 adds the runtime services for RISC-V.
> >
> > The working set of patches can also be found in following git repo.
> > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/uefi_riscv_5.10_v7
> >
> > The patches have been verified on following platforms:
> > 1. Qemu (both RV32 & RV64) for the following bootflow
> > OpenSBI->U-Boot->Linux
> > EDK2->Linux
> > 2. HiFive unleashed using (RV64) for the following bootflow
> > OpenSBI->U-Boot->Linux
> > EDK2->Linux
> >
> > Thanks Abner & Daniel for all work done for EDK2.
> > The EDK2 instructions are available here.
> > https://github.com/JohnAZoidberg/riscv-edk2-docker/
> >
> > Note:
> > 1. Currently, EDK2 RISC-V port doesn't support OVMF package. That's why
> > EFI_GENERIC_STUB_INITRD_CMDLINE_LOADER should be enabled to load initrd via
> > commandline until OVMF patches are available.
> >
> > 2. For RV32, maximum allocated memory should be 1G as RISC-V kernel can not map
> > beyond 1G of physical memory for RV32.
> >
> > 3. Runtime services have been verified with fwts on EDK2.
> >
> > ***********************************************************************
> > [root@fedora-riscv ~]# fwts uefirtvariable
> > Running 1 tests, results appended to results.log
> > Test: UEFI Runtime service variable interface tests.
> > Test UEFI RT service get variable interface. 1 passed
> > Test UEFI RT service get next variable name interface. 4 passed
> > Test UEFI RT service set variable interface. 7 passed, 1 warning
> > Test UEFI RT service query variable info interface. 1 passed
> > Test UEFI RT service variable interface stress test. 2 passed
> > Test UEFI RT service set variable interface stress t.. 4 passed
> > Test UEFI RT service query variable info interface s.. 1 passed
> > Test UEFI RT service get variable interface, invalid.. 5 passed
> > Test UEFI RT variable services supported status. 1 skipped
> >
> > Test |Pass |Fail |Abort|Warn |Skip |Info |
> > uefirtvariable | 25| | | 1| 1| |
> > Total: | 25| 0| 0| 1| 1| 0|
> >
> > ***********************************************************************
> >
> > Changes from v6->v7:
> > 1. Fixed build error reported on linux-next for patch2.
> >
> > Changes from v5->v6:
> > 1. Fixed the static declaration for pt_ops.
> > 2. Added Reviewed/Acked-by.
> >
> > Changes from v4->v5:
> > 1. Late mappings allocations are now done through function pointers.
> > 2. EFI run time services are verified using full linux boot and fwts using EDK2.
> >
> > Changes from v3->v4:
> > 1. Used pgd mapping to avoid copying DT to bss.
> >
> > Changes from v2->v3:
> > 1. Fixed few bugs in run time services page table mapping.
> > 2. Dropped patch 1 as it is already taken into efi-tree.
> > 3. Sent few generic mmu fixes as a separate series to ease the merge conflicts.
> >
> > Changes from v1->v2:
> > 1. Removed patch 1 as it is already taken into efi-tree.
> > 2. Fixed compilation issues with patch 9.
> > 3. Moved few function prototype declaration to header file to keep kbuild happy.
> >
> > Changes from previous version:
> > 1. Added full ioremap support.
> > 2. Added efi runtime services support.
> > 3. Fixes mm issues
> >
> > Anup Patel (1):
> > RISC-V: Move DT mapping outof fixmap
> >
> > Atish Patra (8):
> > RISC-V: Add early ioremap support
> > RISC-V: Implement late mapping page table allocation functions
> > include: pe.h: Add RISC-V related PE definition
> > RISC-V: Add PE/COFF header for EFI stub
> > RISC-V: Add EFI stub support.
> > efi: Rename arm-init to efi-init common for all arch
> > RISC-V: Add EFI runtime services
> > RISC-V: Add page table dump support for uefi
> >
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 25 +++
> > arch/riscv/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/configs/defconfig | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/efi.h | 56 +++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/fixmap.h | 16 +-
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h | 2 +
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/sections.h | 13 ++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 5 +
> > arch/riscv/kernel/efi-header.S | 104 ++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/efi.c | 105 ++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/head.S | 17 +-
> > arch/riscv/kernel/head.h | 2 -
> > arch/riscv/kernel/image-vars.h | 51 +++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 18 +-
> > arch/riscv/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 22 +-
> > arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 191 +++++++++++++-----
> > arch/riscv/mm/ptdump.c | 48 ++++-
> > drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig | 3 +-
> > drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 4 +-
> > .../firmware/efi/{arm-init.c => efi-init.c} | 0
> > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile | 10 +
> > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub.c | 11 +-
> > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/riscv-stub.c | 110 ++++++++++
> > drivers/firmware/efi/riscv-runtime.c | 143 +++++++++++++
> > include/linux/pe.h | 3 +
> > 28 files changed, 901 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/efi.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/sections.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/efi-header.S
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/efi.c
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/image-vars.h
> > rename drivers/firmware/efi/{arm-init.c => efi-init.c} (100%)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/riscv-stub.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/riscv-runtime.c
>
> Thanks. I've also got the tag "riscv-for-efi-5.10", which consists of
>
> 6bf710098245 ("efi: Rename arm-init to efi-init common for all arch")
> f7305a30f0ec ("include: pe.h: Add RISC-V related PE definition")
> d012a7190fc1 ("Linux 5.9-rc2")
>
> and is the base of my for-next. The rest of the patches are also on for-next,
> but quite a bit later.
>
> Ard: IIUC that's what you were looking for? Those two as-is definately aren't
> going to break bisecting, so I think we should be good to start both of our
> for-next branches there. LMK if you were looking for something else.

Yeah that looks fine.