On Sep 23, 2020, at 21:28, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am 23.09.20 um 09:47 schrieb Kai-Heng Feng:
We are seeing the following error after S3 resume:
[ 704.746874] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
[ 704.844232] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: MDI Write did not complete
[ 704.902817] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
[ 704.903075] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: reading PHY page 769 (or 0x6020 shifted) reg 0x17
[ 704.903281] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
[ 704.903486] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: writing PHY page 769 (or 0x6020 shifted) reg 0x17
[ 704.943155] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: MDI Error
...
[ 705.108161] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Hardware Error
Since we don't know what platform firmware may do to the phy, so let's
power cycle the phy upon system resume to resolve the issue.
Is there a bug report or list thread for this issue?
No. That's why I sent a patch to start discussion :)
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 664e8ccc88d2..c2a87a408102 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -6968,6 +6968,8 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
!e1000e_check_me(hw->adapter->pdev->device))
e1000e_s0ix_exit_flow(adapter);
+ e1000_power_down_phy(adapter);
+
rc = __e1000_resume(pdev);
if (rc)
return rc;
How much does this increase the resume time?
I didn't measure it. Because for me it's more important to have a working device.
Does it have a noticeable impact on your system's resume time?