Re: [PATCH 01/15] iio: accel: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat Oct 31 2020 - 07:05:19 EST


On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 22:34:10 +0800
Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:42 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:48:56 +0800
> >> Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Please put a cover letter on your next series explaining the context.
> >> In this particular case some of the replies you have gotten are
> >> general at it is a lot easier to find these sorts of things via
> >> replying to the cover letter.
> >
> >Looking at the number of duplicate messages I would suggest that one
> >needs to go through documentation on how to use git format-patch and
> >git send-email.
> >
>
> Thank you for the suggestion! Actually it's a tree-wide change and it
> seems the kernel community prefer individual patches or series for
> subsystems having the same maintainer over a huge patch set so I wrote
> some scripts to automate the process. That's why you see ~50 emails
> with almost the same commit message. The only difference of these
> commit messages is the name of PM macro.

When doing a bit set like this, it's worth sending out a small subset
first to shake out issue like those seen here.

Once those get merged then send out out the reset.

Thanks,

Jonathan

>
> >--
> >With Best Regards,
> >Andy Shevchenko
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Coiby