Re: [PATCH 01/15] iio: accel: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

[Coiby Xu]

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 11:05:11AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 22:34:10 +0800
> Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:42 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:48:56 +0800
> > >> Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Please put a cover letter on your next series explaining the context.
> > >> In this particular case some of the replies you have gotten are
> > >> general at it is a lot easier to find these sorts of things via
> > >> replying to the cover letter.
> > >
> > >Looking at the number of duplicate messages I would suggest that one
> > >needs to go through documentation on how to use git format-patch and
> > >git send-email.
> > >
> >
> > Thank you for the suggestion! Actually it's a tree-wide change and it
> > seems the kernel community prefer individual patches or series for
> > subsystems having the same maintainer over a huge patch set so I wrote
> > some scripts to automate the process. That's why you see ~50 emails
> > with almost the same commit message. The only difference of these
> > commit messages is the name of PM macro.
>
> When doing a bit set like this, it's worth sending out a small subset
> first to shake out issue like those seen here.
>
> Once those get merged then send out out the reset.
Thank you for the suggestion! Actually I've held off another ~150
emails and these ~200 emails were only part of work. I thought it's
better to reach 4 or 5 subsystem to collect sufficient feedbacks
considering some subsystems may respond slow. But I didn't realize a
better way is to cut down the size of patch set sent to a subsystem.
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > >--
> > >With Best Regards,
> > >Andy Shevchenko
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Coiby

--
Best regards,
Coiby