Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 12/21] x86/pti: Use PTI stack instead of trampoline stack

[Alexandre Chartre]

On 11/16/20 10:24 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Alexandre Chartre
> > Sent: 16 November 2020 18:10
> >
> > On 11/16/20 5:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:47 AM Alexandre Chartre
> > > <alexandre.chartre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > When entering the kernel from userland, use the per-task PTI stack
> > > > instead of the per-cpu trampoline stack. Like the trampoline stack,
> > > > the PTI stack is mapped both in the kernel and in the user page-table.
> > > > Using a per-task stack which is mapped into the kernel and the user
> > > > page-table instead of a per-cpu stack will allow executing more code
> > > > before switching to the kernel stack and to the kernel page-table.
> > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > When executing more code in the kernel, we are likely to reach a point
> > where we need to sleep while we are using the user page-table, so we need
> > to be using a per-thread stack.
>
> Isn't that going to allocate a lot more kernel memory?

That's one of my concern, hence this RFC. The current code is doubling the
task stack (this was an easy solution), so that's +8KB per task. See my
reply to Boris, it has a bit more details.

alex.


> ISTR some thoughts about using dynamically allocated kernel
> stacks when (at least some) wakeups are done by directly
> restarting the system call - so that the sleeping thread
> doesn't even need a kernel stack.
> (I can't remember if that was linux or one of the BSDs)
>
> 	David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)