Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] x86/paravirt: remove no longer needed 32-bit pvops cruft

From: Jürgen Groß
Date: Fri Nov 20 2020 - 07:16:43 EST


On 20.11.20 13:08, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:46:26PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
+#define ____PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, clbr, call_clbr, extra_clbr, ...) \
({ \
PVOP_CALL_ARGS; \
PVOP_TEST_NULL(op); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rettype) > sizeof(unsigned long)); \
+ asm volatile(paravirt_alt(PARAVIRT_CALL) \
+ : call_clbr, ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT \
+ : paravirt_type(op), \
+ paravirt_clobber(clbr), \
+ ##__VA_ARGS__ \
+ : "memory", "cc" extra_clbr); \
+ (rettype)(__eax & PVOP_RETMASK(rettype)); \
})

This is now very similar to ____PVOP_VCALL() (note how PVOP_CALL_ARGS is
PVOP_VCALL_ARGS).

Could we get away with doing something horrible like:

#define ____PVOP_VCALL(X...) (void)____PVOP_CALL(long, X)

?

Oh, indeed. And in patch 9 the same could be done for the ALT variants.


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature