RE: [PATCH v8 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: imx8m: add DT Binding doc for soc unique ID

[Alice Guo (OSS)]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2020年12月18日 17:37
> To: Alice Guo (OSS) <alice.guo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: imx8m: add DT Binding doc for soc
> unique ID
> 
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:05:00AM +0000, Alice Guo (OSS) wrote:
>  > > +    required:
> > > > +      - compatible
> > > > +      - nvmem-cells
> > > > +      - nvmem-cell-names
> > > > +
> > > > +additionalProperties: true
> > >
> > > Don't leave comments unresolved (or resolve them against review
> > > without discussion). Rob asked for changing it. The same as with all
> > > schemas - you need to describe the missing properties.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Krzysztof
> >
> > Hi,
> > Thank you for your advice. I replied to him and let him know I remained here
> unchanged. There will be errors according to his suggestion.
> 
> Then the solution is to correct the errors - describe missing properties
> - instead of ignoring the suggestion and making a resubmit right away.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Hi,
I am sorry I do not DT Binding doc very well.

I checked the usage of patternProperties and additionalProperties in https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/object.html.
I noticed a sentence on the website: " If additionalProperties is a boolean and set to false, no additional properties will be allowed.", so I think that
if additionalProperties is a boolean and set to true, additional properties will be allowed. Letting here unchanged is my solution to correct the errors.
I am not sure, I asked Rob for advice on the v6 by email, but he didn't reply to me, so I made a resubmit.

Thank you for your comment again.

Best regards,
Alice