Re: [PATCH 1/3] tty: hvcs: Drop unnecessary if block
From: Tyrel Datwyler
Date: Wed Jan 20 2021 - 12:18:41 EST
On 1/14/21 9:57 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> If hvcs_probe() succeeded dev_set_drvdata() is called with a non-NULL
> value, and if hvcs_probe() failed hvcs_remove() isn't called.
>
> So there is no way dev_get_drvdata() can return NULL in hvcs_remove() and
> the check can just go away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
> index 509d1042825a..3e0461285c34 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
> @@ -825,9 +825,6 @@ static int hvcs_remove(struct vio_dev *dev)
> unsigned long flags;
> struct tty_struct *tty;
>
> - if (!hvcsd)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> /* By this time the vty-server won't be getting any more interrupts */
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&hvcsd->lock, flags);
>