Re: This reply comments on the patch to fixes the missing a blank line warning
From: Adithya Chandrakasan
Date: Thu Feb 11 2021 - 13:26:49 EST
On 2/11/21 2:36 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> ^
>
> Please create proper patch subjects. Nobody has a glue what you are doing when looking at the subject.
>
> "mm/util: fix ??? warning"
>
> Which raises the question, what is ???
>
> Compiler? static code checker? ... ?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> On 11.02.21 08:29, Adithya Chandrakasan wrote:
>> FILE: mm/util.c:930: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adithya Chandrakasan <adithya.chandrakasan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> mm/util.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
>> index 8c9b7d1e7c49..60286876636d 100644
>> --- a/mm/util.c
>> +++ b/mm/util.c
>> @@ -927,6 +927,7 @@ int get_cmdline(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer, int buflen)
>> unsigned int len;
>> struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(task);
>> unsigned long arg_start, arg_end, env_start, env_end;
>> +
>> if (!mm)
>> goto out;
>> if (!mm->arg_end)
>>
>
>
Hi David,
Thanks for feedback. I have fixed the issues in the patch thread with
change in subject and also log message.
with regards,
Adithya Chandrakasan
--- Begin Message ---
FILE: mm/util.c:930:
checkpatch.pl scripts basic coding style issues as below
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
Signed-off-by: Adithya Chandrakasan <adithya.chandrakasan@xxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/util.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index 8c9b7d1e7c49..60286876636d 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -927,6 +927,7 @@ int get_cmdline(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer, int buflen)
unsigned int len;
struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(task);
unsigned long arg_start, arg_end, env_start, env_end;
+
if (!mm)
goto out;
if (!mm->arg_end)
--
2.25.1
--- End Message ---