Re: This reply comments on the patch to fixes the missing a blank line warning

From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Fri Feb 12 2021 - 05:15:57 EST


On 11.02.21 19:20, Adithya Chandrakasan wrote:
On 2/11/21 2:36 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
^

Please create proper patch subjects. Nobody has a glue what you are doing when looking at the subject.

"mm/util: fix ??? warning"

Which raises the question, what is ???

Compiler? static code checker? ... ?





Thanks

On 11.02.21 08:29, Adithya Chandrakasan wrote:
FILE: mm/util.c:930: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations

Signed-off-by: Adithya Chandrakasan <adithya.chandrakasan@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   mm/util.c | 1 +
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index 8c9b7d1e7c49..60286876636d 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -927,6 +927,7 @@ int get_cmdline(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer, int buflen)
       unsigned int len;
       struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(task);
       unsigned long arg_start, arg_end, env_start, env_end;
+
       if (!mm)
           goto out;
       if (!mm->arg_end)



Hi David,

Thanks for feedback. I have fixed the issues in the patch thread with
change in subject and also log message.

Hi,

Please always send patches via proper mails and versioned.

E.g.,

rm *.patch
git format-patch -1 -v2
git send-email --to ... *.patch


The introducing patch is from 2014. So I wonder how you even get a checkpatch warning?

a90902531a06a ("proc read mm's {arg,env}_{start,end} with mmap semaphore taken.")

Anyhow, maybe just call this patch "mm: util.c: minor coding style fix", that makes it clearer that this is really minor and has been in the code for a while.

Thanks!

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb