Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: hwlock: add sun6i_hwspinlock

[Maxime Ripard]

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Wilken Gottwalt wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:12:44 +0100
> Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 02:03:28PM +0100, Wilken Gottwalt wrote:
> > > Adds documentation on how to use the sun6i_hwspinlock driver for sun6i
> > > compatible series SoCs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v6:
> > >   - fixed formating and name issues in dt documentation
> > >
> > > Changes in v5:
> > >   - changed binding to earliest known supported SoC sun6i-a31
> > >   - dropped unnecessary entries
> > >
> > > Changes in v4:
> > >   - changed binding to sun8i-a33-hwpinlock
> > >   - added changes suggested by Maxime Ripard
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > >   - changed symbols from sunxi to sun8i
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >   - fixed memory ranges
> > > ---
> > >  .../hwlock/allwinner,sun6i-hwspinlock.yaml    | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 
> > The name of the file doesn't match the compatible, once fixed:
> > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This is something that still confuses me. What if you have more than one
> compatible string?

In this case, it's fairly easy there's only one :)

But we're following the same rule than the compatible: the first SoC
that got the compatible wins 

> This won't be solvable. See the qcom binding for example,
> there are two strings and none matches. In the omap bindings are also two
> strings and only one matches. In all cases, including mine, the bindings
> check script is fine with that.

If other platforms want to follow other rules, good for them :)

> So, you basically want it to be called
> "allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock.yaml"?

Yes

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature