Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mmc: iproc-sdhci: Convert to json-schema

[Nicolas Saenz Julienne]

On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 09:27 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> On 2021-03-23 2:24 p.m., Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 15:08 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:11:29PM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> > > > On 2021-03-22 11:58 a.m., Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > > > Convert the brcm,iproc-sdhci binding to DT schema format using json-schema
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  .../bindings/mmc/brcm,iproc-sdhci.yaml        | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  .../bindings/mmc/brcm,sdhci-iproc.txt         | 37 ------------
> > > > >  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> > > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/brcm,iproc-sdhci.yaml
> > > > >  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/brcm,sdhci-iproc.txt
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/brcm,iproc-sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/brcm,iproc-sdhci.yaml
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 000000000000..19d84f3ef9e6
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/brcm,iproc-sdhci.yaml
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > > > +---
> > > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mmc/brcm,iproc-sdhci.yaml#
> > > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > > > +
> > > > > +title: Broadcom IPROC SDHCI controller
> > > > > +
> > > > > +maintainers:
> > > > > +  - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > This is already covered in the MAINTAINERS section via "N:	iproc".
> > > > M:	Ray Jui <ray.jui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > M:	Scott Branden <scott.branden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > M:	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > 
> > > Maybe so, but still required here. The problem is there is no 
> > > MAINTAINERS file in the DT only tree[1].
> > 
> > Well in that case, if Scott and Ray are OK with it I'll add them.
> I do not know what the "maintainers" section in the yaml file is used to indicate.
> If it is maintainer for the driver then please add the duplicate of what is
> already in the MAINTAINERS file.  If it is for maintainer of devicetrees that
> use this driver then no need to add us.

From the dt bindings documentation:

maintainers
  A DT specific property. Contains a list of email address(es)
  for maintainers of this binding.

That's the maintainers for the bindings, not the devicetrees consuming them. I
belive it makes sense for you guys to maintain it as it has a strong
relationship to driver changes. But if you're not interested I'll do it myself.

Regards,
Nicolas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part