Re: [PATCH 16/18] KVM: Don't take mmu_lock for range invalidation unless necessary

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 31/03/21 22:52, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> 100% agree with introducing on_lock separately from the conditional locking.
>
> Not so sure about introducing conditional locking and then converting non-x86
> archs.  I'd prefer to keep the conditional locking after arch conversion.
> If something does go awry, it would be nice to be able to preciesly bisect to
> the conditional locking.  Ditto if it needs to be reverted because it breaks an
> arch.

Ok, that sounds good too.

Paolo