Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: afe: current-sense-shunt: add io-channel-cells
From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat May 08 2021 - 11:58:50 EST
On Sat, 8 May 2021 00:44:58 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2021-05-06 17:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > The current-sense-shunt is an IIO provider thus can be referenced by IIO
> > consumers (via "io-channels" property in consumer device node).
> > Such provider is required to describe number of cells used in phandle
> > lookup with "io-channel-cells" property. This also fixes dtbs_check
> > warnings like:
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-fascinate4g.dt.yaml: current-sense-shunt:
> > '#io-channel-cells' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> >
> > Fixes: ce66e52b6c16 ("dt-bindings:iio:afe:current-sense-shunt: txt to yaml conversion.")
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/afe/current-sense-shunt.yaml | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/afe/current-sense-shunt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/afe/current-sense-shunt.yaml
> > index 90439a8dc785..05166d8a3124 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/afe/current-sense-shunt.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/afe/current-sense-shunt.yaml
> > @@ -24,12 +24,16 @@ properties:
> > description: |
> > Channel node of a voltage io-channel.
> >
> > + "#io-channel-cells":
> > + const: 0
> > +
> > shunt-resistor-micro-ohms:
> > description: The shunt resistance.
> >
> > required:
> > - compatible
> > - io-channels
> > + - "#io-channel-cells"
> > - shunt-resistor-micro-ohms
>
> I know I'm listed as maintainer and all, but I have not kept up with the yaml
> conversion. Sorry. So, given that I might very well fundamentally misunderstand
> something, it does not sound correct that #io-channel-cells is now "required".
> I regard it as optional, and only needed if some other in-kernel driver is
> consuming the sensed current. What am I missing?
>
Agreed. This should be optional and I have deliberately not introduced it
into all the bindings that could in theory support being used as providers.
So far I've not pushed it out in a blanket fashion into existing bindings
even as optional.
> Also, whatever is done in this binding should preferably also be done in the
> two "sister" afe bindings, i.e. current-sense-amplifier and voltage-divider.
This particular case is squashing an error, so whilst I'm happy to have those
gain the binding addition, I would like to see them in a separate patch as
less likely they'd get back ported.
If Kryysztof is fine with me just dropping the required I can pick up this patch.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> > additionalProperties: false
> > @@ -57,6 +61,7 @@ examples:
> > sysi {
> > compatible = "current-sense-shunt";
> > io-channels = <&tiadc 0>;
> > + #io-channel-cells = <0>;
> >
> > /* Divide the voltage by 3300000/1000000 (or 3.3) for the current. */
> > shunt-resistor-micro-ohms = <3300000>;
> >