Hi Yang,Some drivers would expect to free irq itself, I am not sure if it's ok to remove
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 18 May 2021
21:11:27 +0800:
irq allocated with devm_request_irq should not be freed usingWouldn't removing this call the right solution? If it's a device
free_irq, because doing so causes a dangling pointer, and a
subsequent double free.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c b/drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c
index 1f6ba4221817..761c9c468357 100644
--- a/drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c
+++ b/drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c
@@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ static int svc_i3c_master_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- free_irq(master->irq, master);
+ devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, master->irq, master);
managed resource, it won't probably be needed to free it explicitly in
the remove path.
clk_disable_unprepare(master->pclk);Thanks,
clk_disable_unprepare(master->fclk);
clk_disable_unprepare(master->sclk);
Miquèl
.