Re: mtd: spinand: add spi nand mtd resume handler

From: Patrice CHOTARD
Date: Thu May 27 2021 - 09:50:40 EST


Hi Pratyush

On 5/27/21 12:00 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On 26/05/21 05:30PM, patrice.chotard@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> After power up, all SPI NAND's blocks are locked. Only read operations
>> are allowed, write and erase operations are forbidden.
>> The SPI NAND framework unlocks all the blocks during its initialization.
>>
>> During a standby low power, the memory is powered down, losing its
>> configuration.
>> During the resume, the QSPI driver state is restored but the SPI NAND
>> framework does not reconfigured the memory.
>>
>> This patch adds spi nand mtd PM handlers for resume ops.
>> SPI NAND resume op re-initializes SPI NAND flash to its probed state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> index 17f63f95f4a2..6abaf874eb3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> @@ -1074,6 +1074,61 @@ static int spinand_detect(struct spinand_device *spinand)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static void spinand_mtd_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>> +{
>> + struct spinand_device *spinand = mtd_to_spinand(mtd);
>> + struct nand_device *nand = mtd_to_nanddev(mtd);
>> + struct device *dev = &spinand->spimem->spi->dev;
>> + int ret, i;
>> +
>> + ret = spinand_reset_op(spinand);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + ret = spinand_init_quad_enable(spinand);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev,
>> + "Failed to initialize the quad part (err = %d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = spinand_upd_cfg(spinand, CFG_OTP_ENABLE, 0);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev,
>> + "Failed to updtae the OTP (err = %d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return;
>> + }
>
> Since you have reset the flash, this cache is invalid. You should reset
> the cache and re-populate it before using it in any way.

I got your point, i will take it in account in v3 (v2 has already been send but need rework)

>
>> +
>> + ret = spinand_manufacturer_init(spinand);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev,
>> + "Failed to initialize the SPI NAND chip (err = %d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* After power up, all blocks are locked, so unlock them here. */
>> + for (i = 0; i < nand->memorg.ntargets; i++) {
>> + ret = spinand_select_target(spinand, i);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev,
>> + "Failed to select the target (err = %d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = spinand_lock_block(spinand, BL_ALL_UNLOCKED);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev,
>> + "Failed to unlock block (err = %d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>
> Most of these seem to be copied from spinand_init(). I think it is
> better to create a common function that can be called from both
> spinand_init() and spinand_mtd_resume(). This way when someone adds
> something new to the init procedure, like support for some other modes,
> they won't have to remember to update it in two places.

Agree, it was already part of the v2

>
>> static int spinand_init(struct spinand_device *spinand)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = &spinand->spimem->spi->dev;
>> @@ -1167,6 +1222,7 @@ static int spinand_init(struct spinand_device *spinand)
>> mtd->_block_isreserved = spinand_mtd_block_isreserved;
>> mtd->_erase = spinand_mtd_erase;
>> mtd->_max_bad_blocks = nanddev_mtd_max_bad_blocks;
>> + mtd->_resume = spinand_mtd_resume;
>
> Is it possible that the userspace can use this mtd device before the
> resume is finished? Is there a way to temporarily "pause" or unregister
> an mtd device?

Honestly, i don't know.

Thanks
Patrice

>
>>
>> if (nand->ecc.engine) {
>> ret = mtd_ooblayout_count_freebytes(mtd);
>