Re: [PATCH 7/8] all: replace find_next{,_zero}_bit with find_first{,_zero}_bit where appropriate

[Yury Norov]

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 12:47:31AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 3:39 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > find_first{,_zero}_bit is a more effective analogue of 'next' version if
> > start == 0. This patch replaces 'next' with 'first' where things look
> > trivial.
> 
> Depending on the maintainers (but I think there will be at least few
> in this case) they would like to have this be split on a per-driver
> basis.
> I counted 17 patches. I would split.
> 
> Since many of them are independent you may send without Cc'ing all
> non-relevant people in each case.

submitting-patches.rst says:

        On the other hand, if you make a single change to numerous files,
        group those changes into a single patch.  Thus a single logical change
        is contained within a single patch.

Also refer 96d4f267e40f9 ("Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() functioin.")

Yury