On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 09:30:53AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
So then just always use the "fallback" name if that is going to be theThen do not break things by renaming the device name, as you all haveThe renaming comes from the fallback mode on future systems. In the fallback
now stated that this name is part of the user/kernel api.
mode the driver doesn't know the true name, so it has to use the numeric
name. If you don't use the fallback mode and have the full driver then yes
you'll get the same names as always (or at least as they make sense for the
hardware).
But we would like to have the fallback mode too to allow more people use
uncore monitoring, and that's where the need to for the second name comes
in.
name you have for this hardware device. Why would you want it to be
renamed later on to a "fancier" name if there is only going to be
one-per-chipset-type anyway?