Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] mfd: tps65086: Make interrupt line optional

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:18:01AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Jun 2021, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > 
> > > The BeagleV Starlight v0.9 board[1] doesn't have the IRQB line routed to
> > > the SoC, but it is still useful to be able to reach the PMIC over I2C
> > 
> > What is still useful?
> > 
> > The GPIO and Regulator drivers?
> > 
> > > for the other functionality it provides.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglev-starlight
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml  |  3 ---
> > >  drivers/mfd/tps65086.c                        | 21 ++++++++++---------
> > >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml
> > > index ba638bd10a58..4b629fcc0df9 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml
> > > @@ -87,9 +87,6 @@ additionalProperties: false
> > >  required:
> > >    - compatible
> > >    - reg
> > > -  - interrupts
> > > -  - interrupt-controller
> > > -  - '#interrupt-cells'
> > 
> > I can't say that I've been keeping up with the latest DT binding
> > changes, but shouldn't these lines be relocated into some kind of
> > optional listing?
> > 
> > Or are optional properties omitted from documentation?
> 
> Optional properties are the ones not listed in the 'required' list.

Ah, so they are already documented somewhere else in the file?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog