Re: [PATCH resend] staging: rtl8188eu: move all source files from core subdirectory

[Fabio Aiuto]

Dear Phillip,

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:54:43PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:00:36AM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 06:46:16PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > > On 7/19/21 5:46 PM, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > > > Move all C source files from the core subdirectory to the root
> > > > folder of the driver, and adjust Makefile accordingly. The ultmate
> > > > goal is to remove hal layer and fold its functionalty into the main
> > > > sources. At this point, the distinction between hal and core will be
> > > > meaningless, so this is the first step towards simplifying the file
> > > > layout.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >   drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/Makefile            | 34 +++++++++----------
> > > >   drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/{core => }/rtw_ap.c |  0
> > > >   .../staging/rtl8188eu/{core => }/rtw_cmd.c    |  0
> > > >   .../staging/rtl8188eu/{core => }/rtw_efuse.c  |  0
> > > >   .../rtl8188eu/{core => }/rtw_ieee80211.c      |  0
> > > >   .../rtl8188eu/{core => }/rtw_ioctl_set.c      |  0
> > > >   .../staging/rtl8188eu/{core => }/rtw_iol.c    |  0
> >  > 
> > > 
> > > I think this is just source churning. The current setup with include. core.
> > > hal and os_dep subdirectories are not opressive.
> > > 
> > > Larry
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > maybe the information we will need one day is:
> > 
> > will the core/-os_dep/-hal/-include/-directory-structure be
> > welcomed in mainline wireless subsystem, when an rtl* driver
> > will be perfectly tuned?
> > 
> > At the moment I can't see such a directory organization
> > in any of the realtek wireless driver.
> > 
> > Sure there's time for that ;),
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> > fabio
> > 
> > 
> Dear Fabio,
> 
> Certainly a good start is removing this 'hal' layer so for now I'll
> focus on that as much as I can. Perhaps the path forwards will become
> clearer without it there :-) Thank you for your feedback.

Agreed

> 
> Regards,
> Phil

thank you,

fabio