Re: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled clocks enabled clocks

[Wolfram Sang]

> The idea is that you will send a PR to CCF maintainers instead of
> patches, although it's expected that patches appear in the mailing
> list beforehand anyway.

Depends a little. For me, a Rev-by from the driver maintainer is enough,
and I'll pick them. That lowers the burden on the drivers maintainer
side. May not work for high volumes of patches, but for I2C this works
enough.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature