Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufs: Probe for temperature notification support

[Bart Van Assche]

On 9/1/21 5:37 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return hba->dev_info.high_temp_notif;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_low_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return hba->dev_info.low_temp_notif;
> +}

Please do not introduce single line inline functions.

> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(hba) ||
> +	       ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(hba);
> +}

Since this function is not in any hot path (command processing), 
shouldn't it be moved into ufshcd.c?

Thanks,

Bart.